Elizabeth Jones, 22, was sentenced to 16 months in prison after she lied that a man raped her because she “did not like him.” The man was arrested, taken into custody, and questioned for nine hours. CCTV of the house in which Jones claimed to have been attacked did not support her story. Contrary to her tale, it did not show her being forcibly taken there. Jones admitted to one count of attempting to pervert the course of justice. The story is reported here.

This was Jones’ eleventh false rape claim in a decade. She made her first complaint in 2004 when she was just 13. In 2009 she was given a ten month detention and training order for a similar offence. Between 2005 and 2007 she had made eight other allegations, which police investigated, but she was never charged.

Judge Derwin Hope said her offences had caused a “terrible emotional experience” to her alledged attacker. But he also said it struck at the heart of the criminal justice system. Megan Topliss, defending, said her client had endured a disturbed childhood and had been left traumatised after being taken into care.

image
She does have a point. I’m sure a man, at some point, was within 3ft of her. Or your work-a-day rapist has developed some sort of woman-hating superpower.

All men are rapists and that’s all they are. They rape us with their eyes, their laws, and their codes.”
-Marilyn French

The importance of the Male Pill (Male contraception).
ManWomanMyth.com one of the most comprehensive video series on the goverment backed inequality between the genders and the failure out of feminism has a HIGHLY recommended video detailing the importance of male contraception.

I recieved quite a bit of nasty mail from feminists and others saying that it isn’t important because it is focussed on a singe facet of gender. However, as this video explains, the freedom that comes with contraception is far reaching.

Please visit the site and enjoy.

Alt. Youtube Link to the video.

“Patriarchy Did This!” Series: #005

Before I bathe in the torrent of feminist rage-tears this is to address what I’m going to call the scientific double standard.

Any empirical evidence showing proof or suggestion of male advantages in a certain context is sexist. If I was to say, “Men are stronger than women”, I would be rebutted by the fact that certain men are stronger than certain women, and rightfully so. However any science, no matter how scant, proclaiming the glories of that almighty uterus and the eternal XX chromosome combo are upheld as the natural superiority of women.

“Men are stronger than women” = Unfair, biased, sexist.
“Women are stronger than men” = It’s science, girl power, truth.

Anyone else see the disconnect?


“Our DNA has been studied and it’s all about keeping the child from falling in the fire…whereas the men’s DNA is all about dragging the carcass from point A back to the cave. Who would you want helping make these laws?”

Oh, Sigourney. I used to like you and your movies. Let’s analyze this. Firstly, she starts off by complaining that women are under-represented in government given that they make up 51% of the population. This instantly shows she doesn’t grasp the concept of democracy — at all.

Secondly, women are also under-represented in war deaths, war injured, suicide, incarceration, violent deaths, workplace deaths, heart attack, stroke, not to mention all the physical and arduous jobs. The day I see a woman trash collector I’ll let everyone know.

Now to her point about women being genetically superior to men in terms of practicality, decision making etc. This sounds a lot like the racialist eugenics of times past. “Our DNA has been studied” — No it hasn’t.

Feminists are the FIRST to use (Pseudo)science when it supports their unwarranted sense of superiority over men but condemn any science (even scientific breakthroughs like the DOZENS of male contraceptive pills that have been stonewalled and stuck in phase III clinical trials because of feminist meddling and lobbying) that doesn’t fall in line with their dogma, and it is DOGMA. Without logic or reason or critique.

What this woman is spouting is indicative of not only feminists attempts to undermine democracy by shoehorning women into power without proper process but the overall goal of placing the value of women in higher esteem over men than it is already. Last time I checked that’s bigotry.

Before any feminists begin to flame this post saying that true feminists are for equality then why haven’t there been any public admonition of her statements?

Feminists: Always yammering about equality; All too willing to take superiority.

  • Me: (to the people at my lunch table) Dr. Theo Colburn's book on men's health is tremendous. It's great to see someone with such insight into the future. Really great stuff. I didn't know someone could put physiology into a historical perspective like that. Seriously.
  • *Uninvited feminist coworker interjects*
  • Feminist: Of course you didn't. After all, you only read books by men
  • Me: What?
  • Feminist: You're so quick to agree with a man on the concept of male physiology but when it's a woman I guarantee you'd be skeptical -- as always.
  • Me: Have you read the book?
  • Feminist: It doesn't matter! Look, if the subject is written from a male perspective it isn't science because it's biased discourse! I don't need to read the book.
  • Me: ...
  • Feminist: Right? It's pretty obvious bias. If you can't see that you're an idiot.
  • Me: Dr. Theo Colburn is a woman. Also, you need to find constructive things to be angry about.

Patriarchy Did This!” Series: #005

There’s always instances where men go from simply disposable to invisible.